The Reaping (2007) – DVD
*/**** Image C+ Sound A Extras C-
starring Hilary Swank, David Morrissey, Idris Elba, Stephen Rea
screenplay by Carey W. Hayes & Chad Hayes
directed by Stephen Hopkins
by Walter Chaw Brave enough to show a few kid corpses hanging up in a basement but not brave enough to actually be about a tormented woman murdering an adorable antichrist, Stephen Hopkins’s The Reaping harvests its share of not-startling jump scares and not-interesting scripture for a frugal repast of mainstream diddle. Neither bad in the way of End of Days nor good in the way of Stigmata, it is instead another millennial picture about sacrificing our children to questionable causes and Old Testament vengeance wrought upon the unholy. I understand why we get films like this in 2007, films full of dead kids and religious wrath, but understanding why isn’t the same thing as valuing the picture. Its confusion between being neo-conservative while believing that it’s ultra-liberal muddies the final “twist” of the picture, posing the interesting conundrum of whether or not abortion is okay if the fate of the world hangs in the balance. Though it’s pretty clear where the film has led its audience, that doesn’t make the question any less thorny. (What it does do is make The Reaping‘s consummate, dedicated emptiness its only lingering aftertaste.) Count as its scattershot sources Rosemary’s Baby, The Bad Seed, The Amityville Horror, Alien, I Walked with a Zombie, The Skeleton Key, Exorcist: The Beginning, and so on–the only purpose of composing such a list to point out how much the film allows for masturbatory skylarking, harking back to genre pictures better and worse.



by Walter Chaw
![The Hills Have Eyes 2 (2007) [Unrated] – DVD](https://i0.wp.com/filmfreakcentral.net/wp-content/uploads/2007/08/HillsHaveEyes2.png?fit=800%2C345&ssl=1)
by Walter Chaw
June 10, 2007|I pretty much disagree with most of what Eli Roth has to say about Hostel Part II. An unabashed fan of his work for its delicate balancing act of depravity, deathly-black humour, and loving homage, I found his latest film an exciting self-reflexive exercise–a casual question mark thrown at moviegoers who would knowingly pay to see graphic depictions of torture. But the man himself insists that his primary goal lies in pleasing the audience with his specialized brand of perversion–and if, in explaining his technique, he comes across as abrasive, self-important, and longwinded, it’s because he’s got a lot of set ideas about what his films are saying and at whom they’re targeted; furthermore, he’s unafraid to expound on those ideas in excruciating detail. And yet, his aversion to accepted subtext–as well as his somewhat wishy-washy consideration of critical reaction–neatly encapsulates one of the most admirable aspects of Hostel Part II, i.e., how its finest (read: grisliest) moments at once point to something bubbling under the surface and somehow thwart a deeper reading of the Guignol thrills. Roth certainly lays a great deal of his personality and excitement for cinema on the table for all to see, but still I wonder what he’s keeping hidden. I’m reminded of how his mentor David Lynch deadpanned a challenge to viewers to find the “correct” interpretation of Eraserhead.
by Alex Jackson

by Walter Chaw
by Walter Chaw